data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4498e/4498ef7541d5854f31d58b7c966028987bd9af89" alt=""
The south part of Megalopolis features the 'Ancient Theater' (built around 370 BC), which could seat 20,000, with a Bouleterion, called the 'Thersilion' after the guy who paid for it, in front of the stage. What is a Bouleterion, you ask? Why, it's essentially the place where Ancient Greek town meetings, and most debates/speeches, are held. As the design below shows, the one at Megalopolis was arranged with oddly-spaced columns (the round dots) radiating from a central square where the speaker stood. That way, each seat in the house had a clear sightline to the speaker:
![]() |
Megalopolis Bouleterion |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73636/736367b8366e32ea945591353540a3bb4c03b990" alt=""
But that's just the South part of the city! OK, so it happens to have the famous Thersilion Bouleterion and the (at times controversial) Theatre. And I do mean controversial. Back in 1891, this was hot stuff, even making the arts pages. Check out this commentary, from the equivalent of Variety of the day:
A quarrel is a capital thing in a family, but, like all other good things, it should come to an end some time or other. There was a theatre built several hundred years BC, of which a good deal still remains to be quarrelled over; but we must say that we think it would show better taste if people just dropped the subject now. The theatre (or its ruins) is at Megalopolis; but it is quite a long time since there were any performances there - a thousand years, very likely. Probably the Megalopolitan Lord Chamberlain would insist on its being relicensed if they wanted to play the Agamemnon or the Seven Against Thebes there now; and, anyhow, we think Mr Gardner and Dr Dorpfeld might leave off squabbling about it in the highly respectable page of the Athenaeum. No doubt the point they are fighting over is one of supreme importance. Dr Dorpfeld says that the lower steps could not possibly, any more than the wall at the back, belong to the original structure, and Mr Gardner says contrariwise. But, after a thousand years or so, even a subject like this palls, unless, indeed, it is treated by Mr Rider Haggard; and Mr Gardner's obstinacy has actually brought a pretty girl into the controversy. Miss (or Mrs) Eugenie Sellers - we do not know her, but she must be pretty with that name - has only last week written a letter to say that Mr G. is a bold, bad man and has no right to chaff Dr D. about the scaenae frons when he makes such gross errors himself about the logeion. Eugenie even goes so far as to say some very cross things about certain Skenengebdude mentioned by Mr G. (Theatrical Gossip', The Era 11 July 1891.)As a result, when driving around we had no problem finding many signs for these ruins, and then they had a parking lot, and of course the 'closed for renovations' sign. So we took the shot shown above and moved on to Lykosura and Gortyna.
When we were driving back, however, we had to pass by Megalopolis and I happened to look over and see something on the right hand side of the road. It was a huge area, surrounded by an ancient fence that had large sections missing and the gate was open. We couldn't pass up the opportunity to take a look.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82e15/82e15e8142ee5c4b41bc46c7c89c8d5b82ef47ba" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a4ff/5a4ff1c2f20b031f23e4a049bc829b00a2610562" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc975/cc9752c0d84f2eed257bccc459a373197c88b480" alt=""
The "Stoa of Philip" is gigantic, 160 meters long. And here is where things get tricky, because when you're blogging largely based on Wikipedia entries or the equivalent, you tend to get single clear answers. When you're reading about the original excavations (one of the first done by the British School in Athens), and then following up with people who've cited that work, you get lots of different interpretations and explanations. My favorite one is that the 'Philip' referred to here was Philip I, the father of Philip II and grandfather of Alexander the Great, and that he donated the funds to build it to help convince the Arcadian league to support his son, Philip II. It's not a sure thing, however, and the number of different stories began to exceed what I could track down while in Greece. Apparently the Center for Hellenic Studies at Harvard has a number of the original books on this (in their rare book section), so I may take a short road trip when I get home. As you can see in these pictures, though, this is a high end site - multiple columns still standing, walls still up, etc. And yet totally abandoned.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81408/81408768016ad077adb98633f980dfd659820ca1" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45a85/45a854e8e606364892bf6cb2367ac2f31a34819e" alt=""
Over on one side of the stoa is an exedra, a great word not used enough in daily conversation ("a room (as in a temple or house) in ancient Greece and Rome used for conversation and formed by an open or columned recess often semicircular in shape and furnished with seats.") This I learned from reading the abstract to "The sanctuary of Zeus Soter at Megalopolis (by Ulrich-Walter Gans)" who noted
New German-Greek excavations undertaken in 1991. The sanctuary was founded at the same time as the Stoa of Philippi in 340, both part of a vast urban planning program, for which Athenian sculptors were summoned. The annex against the north wall is not a propylon but an exedra.Here's what remains of it today (again, I think -- it's hard to be sure without a site plan, and nobody seems to have made one up):
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/abdca/abdcaf3b8ceae9baaa5a820d0908a762389c40d9" alt=""
Finally, we come to the last identified structure, the Temple of Zeus Soter (which means 'Zeus Savior'). This has begin to fall into the river, but the parts that haven't are in decent shape as 2400-year-old temples go. There is more information to be had about the temple, but sadly not online.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ddef8/ddef8e47d5068277a3ade46e855112a0dc753d56" alt=""
Finally, we're left with some structures of unknown origin; there were quite of few of these, but I've been utterly unable to figure out what they were.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33343/33343f3a3c070df03549b62efaca4552f98936ea" alt=""
You are right!
ReplyDeleteThe lack of information is non-excusable. Here is my personal statement (via link).
http://www.fleig-fleig.de/peloponnes11-3.html
Kind regards - Horst Fleig